In communications, which appeal would be least effective with someone who values emotional reasoning?

Rational appeal primarily relies on logical reasoning and factual evidence to persuade an audience. Individuals who prioritize emotional reasoning tend to respond more to feelings, personal experiences, and emotional connections rather than to logic and data. As a result, using a rational appeal may not resonate with someone who values emotional perspectives, making it the least effective choice in this context.

In contrast, ethical appeal connects with the audience's sense of morality and credibility, practical appeal focuses on tangible benefits and real-world applications, and personal appeal taps into individual emotions and personal experiences. All three are likely to engage someone who values emotional reasoning more effectively than a purely logical argument would.