Which court case ruled that officers may use deadly force to prevent escape only under certain conditions?

The case of Tennessee v. Garner is significant because it established the legal standards governing the use of deadly force by law enforcement when apprehending a fleeing suspect. The Supreme Court ruled that officers may only use deadly force to prevent the escape of a suspect if they have probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical harm to the officer or others. This ruling emphasizes the importance of assessing the threat level posed by a suspect before deciding to use deadly force, thereby setting boundaries and conditions under which such force is permissible. This case is pivotal in law enforcement training and in shaping policies related to the use of force.

In contrast, the other court cases focus on different aspects of law enforcement and constitutional rights. Miranda v. Arizona deals primarily with the rights of individuals when being interrogated by police, Graham v. Connor addresses the reasonableness of the use of force in general, and Ferguson v. City of Charleston is concerned with medical privacy and the Fourth Amendment rather than the use of force in apprehending suspects.