Which legal principle is unaffected by the legal authorities for the use of force?

The principle of civil remedies remains unaffected by the legal authorities governing the use of force because civil remedies pertain to the rights of individuals to seek compensation or redress for harm suffered, typically through lawsuits. When law enforcement officers act within the bounds of the law regarding use of force, this does not negate the potential for civil suits against them if their actions result in harm. These civil actions can address issues such as negligence or violation of civil rights, independent of the circumstances that might protect the officer under criminal law or self-defense statutes.

In contrast, criminal liabilities and self-defense laws are directly linked to the use of force and can influence whether an officer is found guilty or acquitted in a criminal context. Use of deadly force is also closely tied to legal regulations as it mandates specific conditions under which it can be employed. Therefore, civil remedies stand apart as they seek to address the repercussions suffered by individuals from law enforcement actions, regardless of the justification for the use of force.